Engine conversion options

6 replies [Last post]
Badnews
Badnews's picture
Offline
Joined: 16.01.2012
Location: Derby

I have a 460 G wagon 1983 300GD that I'm looking to convert to have enough power to move acceptably!!!

Its got the 5 pot diesel engine common in these with amighty 80 something bhp....I'm looking to maybe use a 606 TD engine with a 602 mechanical fuel pump....

My questions are:-

(1) What kind of power can be achieved from a standard 606 E300 TD engine with a 602 mechanical fuel pump.
(2) The 5 speed box I have as standard, will this mate up to the 606 lump?  Are there any specific challenges relating to this? I dont fancy having auto transmission and want to keep the manual box if possible.
(3) the Std 5 speed box I have, will this turn to cheese with 606 td power?

Cheers,
Badnews :D

fcp
fcp's picture
Offline
Joined: 10.05.2011
Location: Hampshire
GWOA Groups: Members
Re: Engine conversion options

 I'm right at the earliest stage of planning this swap into my '86 300GD and have been talking with a few people here and elsewhere (Pointed 3, Superturbodiesel are good sources) who have been through it.

A recent thread on this was here http://www.gwoa.co.uk/forum/axel-burg-606962-g-conversion 

The one thing I have learned is that it isn't a trivial Sat PM job.. or at least it isn't if you want to do it to a high standard.

There are a few people who will do it on a commercial basis for you too, which might be a good route if you don't fancy the grief (G class centre is one name that comes up time and again).

So far, I've bought a complete low milelage '98 engine and 603 mechanical pump (into which the 606 plungers need to be swapped). I'm planning to hook that up to a 711.620 5 speed manual transmission from a Sprinter van with a solid flywheel conversion.

I'm now just working carefully through the complete list of parts and changes I think will need to be made before getting started.  I plan to document every step as I go though (including part numbers so that might be useful to you) and I'll post it online somewhere.

The questions I think can answer (though others will correct me as neccessary please - I  am learning here myself as I go) are:

1. With the 606 plungers fitter to the 603 and some adjustment, you could expect standard 606 T (174hp/ 300Nm or so at the crank) - perhaps a bit more.  If you go bigger turbo (Holset HX35, 40 or similar) and a fettled pump (Myna in Finland seem to be a favorite), then anything upto 400HP seems fairly common with stock internals. Don't like Turbo lag? add an Eaton M90 supercharger (not sure where it would fit!) and get + 40% across most of the range. Start changing stock Internals (rods etc) and north of 600HP is in the realms of possibility it seems. The 606 is hugely flexible and evidently very strong.

I'm shooting for the standard turbo performance which with the gearing I have (35" tyres standard 4.88 final ratio) will put me at around 2600 RPM at a sensible cruising speed (anything over 3K it drinks petrol I'm told).

2. No - you'll need a gearbox that has a suitable flange to suit the 606. I haven't done a lot of research here, but it seems many of the modern Merc boxes do. Axel-Burg's conversion is using a 6 speed CLK box I understand.  You need something that will handle 300 Nm and in answer to 3) most likely if it is the ususal Getrag that was fitted to the 300GD.

You will also need to consider the output shaft flange.. again more research I need to do here.

Some of the other major concerns I've learned about are:

Diff clearance.  Unless you fancy either:

i) cutting and re-welding the sump from a 606 saloon or
ii) making custom frame mounts (+50-75mm I think ) which I'm not convinced are great

then you'll need to buy the correct 606.964 sump (fitted to the 300 Turbodiesel G) which is c. £800 or so (I'm still trying to confirm the precise # number for it as there are 2 or 3 variations shown on the EPC diagram - anyone know which is right?).

It might be that you still need a body lift tp clear the transmission in the tunnel (again this is not immediately clear from other people experience).

I was also advised yesterday that clutch setup can be a real bitch too. Not sure if that is specific to one combination of flywheel and trans or just generally.. since there's no Workshop manual for this mostly you have to find out the hard way it seems!

I know that there are a ton of other potential problems too (waterpump, throttle setup, brake booster).. hell I should be talking myself out of it really... On the other hand I've been totally inspired by the antics of those crazy scandawegians who seem to ignore the 'why you shouldn't' arguments and do some inspired things with the 606s.

Cheers

Pistonhead
Pistonhead's picture
Offline
Joined: 17.12.2006
Location: Loughborough
GWOA Groups: Committee, Members
Re: Engine conversion options

Hello Badnews,

Aside from the PM message to you, I have come up with some information looked up for the chap I have mentioned in the PM.

It may be of use to you.

Below are details of gearbox findings as used on the W 202 chassis.

C250TD – chassis: W 202.128, engine: OM 606.960, manual gearbox: 717460, automatic gearbox: 722436, 722612, 722697.

C250TD – chassis: W202.188, engine: OM 605.960, manual gearbox: 717460, automatic gearbox: 722612, 722697.

I beleive these engines are 150 BHP/280Nm.  The gearbox is mated to the engines and so is the starter motor.   I do not know of the logistics of fitting to the G-Wagen, sump clearence etc,etc...

Hope it is of some help. 

stig
stig's picture
Offline
Joined: 24.02.2007
Location: Girona, Spain
GWOA Groups: Members
Re: Engine conversion options
Badnews
Badnews's picture
Offline
Joined: 16.01.2012
Location: Derby
Re: Engine conversion options

 Cheers Rakesh ! you are a fountain of information!!!!!

FCP, thanks for confirming I've entered the minefield!!!!! hopefully if enough of us do the conversion and document it properly it wont be so hard for the later people who fancy giving it a try!  I was wishful thinking hoping I could find out all I need in one thread :S 

Stig, I caught that thread before and gave it a read a while back, nice work!!! I'l be going over it again soon and probably asking you a million questions once I have!!!

Cheers guys!

Back to the drawing board Re: gearbox it seems....

Pistonhead
Pistonhead's picture
Offline
Joined: 17.12.2006
Location: Loughborough
GWOA Groups: Committee, Members
Re: Engine conversion options

That ackelaid goes to stig, it wasn't me.  Not sure about the spelling though, even my spell checker doesn't know it.

bigblock
bigblock's picture
Offline
Joined: 27.05.2009
Location: HIGHLANDS
GWOA Groups: Committee, Members
Re: Engine conversion options

 That would be spelt accolade.