When and how to engage 4WD - Mercedes G 460 series
I'm refering to this article http://www.4x4abc.com/jeep101/engage.html
Quote:
"When to engage
Off-road the answer is easy - once you leave pavement shift from 2WD (S - Strasse = street) into 4WD high (SA - Strasse Allrad = street 4WD) and leave it there until returning to pavement. It is a proactive measure to maintain traction in all conditions."
The confusing part is for me in the same article
Quote:
"Remember that brakes are layed out in a way that 80% of the force goes to the front and 20% to the rear? That keeps the rear from losing traction and swapping ends. In SA or GA brake power is distributed equally. Part of the 80% to the front will now be transferred through the drivehafts to the rear. The rear will break lose. The rear will come around. Roll overs are just waiting to happen."
If I understand the mechanics correctly it is not very safe to engage part time 4x4 when traveling on a normal dirt road as it makes roll overs easier.But in most 4x4 magazines etc they advice you to engage 4x4 as soon as you go off-road.
Anybody who can give me some clarity on this issue?
The statement about swapping ends is correct, braking stability is adversely affected. Also when you have locked the two axles together steering becomes even more vague.
So you need to determine the probability of losing traction and at what speed you will be travelling.
You mention dirt roads. If these are dry with good traction and you intend travelling at moderate speeds say up to 70Km/h then leave it in 2WD. Leaving it in 4WD just for the sake of it will unnecessarily stress components even on non-paved surfaces. As a comparator I find when driving through snow it’s sometimes best to leave it in 2WD. I’d rather have steering and brakes than traction sometimes! OK when it’s deep and slow I engage 4WD. All the above refers to 460’s / Series III LR’s etc. not 463’s Defenders etc.
As soon as conditions become difficult and your speed reduces significantly then yes engage 4WD. It’s all a matter of anticipation / experience, if necessary get out and walk the route. Leave it too late and you will lose traction and any momentum. Don’t read too much in to momentum bit. Momentum is definitely overstated by people with more power/money than sense!! OK if you have a trailer to take your G home on. Not what you are after I think. Remember if you have approached a situation slowly and do get stuck you should be able to engage 4WD and reverse out without actually breaking anything. Remember ANYTHING will break if you’re dumb enough!
Russ
When I used LRover products I was advised to use the high/low bow from time to time to stop things seizing up, am I right to do the same on my G from time to time?
When I owned my 460, I made a rule to engage/disengage 4WD and the front and rear diff locks from time to time, to prevent them seizing. Obviously I'd do all this at walking pace, on dirt surface and mainly with the steering almost straight. I think that it's a good policy if you want to keep your stuff in good nick. Now that I own a 463 I do the same with the diff locks.
I think my translation of a German Army instructional manual on the use of Gaelendawagens Gs. on/off road.
460 Transmition selector, S=street. SA= street all wheel center diffrential free. Sa 2nd position= Street all wheel centre diff lock. GA off road low ratio centre diff locked.
SA& Sa2 may be engaged at any speed and any terrain.GA vehicle must be in motion up to 15km hr.
GA may also be used to move off when towing heavier loads than normal when vehicle reaches 30 km change main gear box to second when vehicle reaches 50 km change transfer box to 2nd SA then SA with out stopping, proceed to change gears then select S.
Diff locks must only be selected when on the move on loose surface. upto 15km hr. they will only engage when one wheel turns faster than another, Therefore turning a circle will assist in engaging/disengaging diff locks.
Following use of diff locks reverse vehicle t to unwind the transmision.
Now this is not a great deal different from how a Alvis Stalwart and FV 432s were driven in my army days, not to say Saracens Salladins and Ferrets and many other multi wheel drive multi ratioAFVs, so its probably correct.
Having tested it on many occasion, I am convinced it is.
Bill Moss
Thanks for that info Bill, I have been incorrectly using my diff locks at standstill and I'll bet I'm not alone, they never light up till about 5 yards so I'm sure you're right (again), ever thought about writing a book?.
Sorry to be so boringly predictable, lol. but its age and experience. collect all these tit bits and you can write the book.
Bill
BRAKES and SWAPPING ends.
The statement above is incorrect as I will prove.
Unloaded and brakes properley adjusted the initial braking force on a G is distributed mostly to the front on about a 60/40 split but this depends on proper adjustment of your rear brake & load sensor. G suspension geometry is so designed as to prevent nose diving as well as rolling so when you brake you may have noticed your vehicle duck down, this loads the rear sensor and increases brake force to the rear wheels and reduces it to the front, its a sort of mechanical active suspension. when your G is fully loaded the situation is reversed maximum braking is to the rear imediatley and you will notice if your compensator is adjusted properly that your nose actually lifts thus reversing the process, active suspension mechanicaly linked to braking distribution and anti roll. something those boffins in Land Rover couldnt master, but then they have never built a racing car.
Bill Moss
OK Bill I think you maybe right, but in context of Johann’s original question I maybe correct also.
He talks about dirt tracks. I suspect he intends travelling long distances over reasonably surfaced tracks. Therefore speeds of 40MPH plus would be expected. IF he mechanically locks front and rear axles (normal 460 4WD) the load compensator on the rear axle will not function as you describe.
If the front wheels are locked up under braking, which you would expect given the greater force available, one or both of the rears will lock. I don’t think the brake distribution compensator will stop this occurring. Who knows if one or both will lock given what diff’s can get up to?!
In any event this is obviously going to affect stability. Once the back end breaks away you need to be a very proficient driver to recover. Not so bad on a smooth surface. However on uneven ground at moderate speeds you are likely to roll.
I stand to be corrected, I am no expert and am basing this on incidents I have either been involved in or have witnessed where either Series III LR’s or Defenders with centre diff’s locked have either spun or more seriously rolled at high speed. You certainly don’t want to be in a Defender that rolls!!
Incidentally just been out and tested the anti dive geometry, does seem to be as you state. This now raises the question of how the rear distribution compensator works? My perception was that as the front dived the rear raised and the linkage to the brake compensator operated. The valve sees this and reduces the braking effort to the rear. Seems to be more to it than that though?
Russ
Ok Russ I think our differences are converging.
When you brake, the suspension geometry is set such that the rear sinks at or about the same rate as the front, thus preventing nose dive activating the load sensor, ie loading it and transfering the braking force rearwards as braking progresses.also giving equal down force and acting almost like ABS, because as you slow down the force gets less, and the brake compensator resets itself.
This is a problem in Motor racing, bcause as down force decreases with speed, so brake force has to decrease to prevent lock up, drivers have to lieraly lift the brake foot off the deeper they get into the corner however keep speed to a maximum to maitain down force. toe and heel driving.
To prevent end swapping at speed on gravel or loose track,or even Silverstone, set up the compensator to initiate early, this is achieved by lengthening the actuating rod to the bell crank.
If you want to go the whole hog, make the compensator finitly adjustable by disconecting it from the axle drill a hole in the floor above the unit and pass a threaded rod down to the compensator. put a nut wheel on the rod and a securing device and you can easily adjust it to your needs, a better approach is to use a bowden cable with a trigger type adjuster in the cab, you can then alter adjustment as you drive, ala F1 F3 F3000 DTM WRC etc it's the one adjustment drivers won't allow to be electronic because its all about feeling it with your backside and your foot. Remeber tho no matter what, : if you brake or accelerate when going through a corner, or not in a straight line you will spin off, because our old friend G force takes over and you become a passenger on a pendulum. remember your physics, potential and kinetic energy.
Bill Moss. :D
OK Bill this is bugging me now!
If I've read it correct because of the anti dive geometry the action of the load compensator on a G is the opposite of how I had figured. It actually allows greater braking effort to go to the rear as you brake. NOT reducing it due to nosedive.
Correct?
Still believe braking stability to be compromised if you lock the fonts in 4WD though.
BTW have driven cars with adjustable brake bias. Totally unpredictable……..made a complete prat of myself! As a racing instructor once commented on my driving " thats whats called in the trade..........big balls, small brain"
Russ
Correct, and the more you load it,ie pax or cargo the sooner that happens.
This is why there is a fairly small load limit on the tow ball. not drag force but nose weight of trailer , over load and this totaly upsets the balance of brake compensators in conjunction with suspension geometry. ergo upside down caravans on motorways.
Couldnt agree more about lock up, if you are locked up you are out of control, Mr G force is driving your car your a passenger,and he aint very good.
How unkind of your instructor, couldnt he recall the day he had a lot of bottle but not much experience.
Just read your profile Russ, no wonder your getting confused, power boats use the other end to steer.
LOL
When you have moved the 2nd lever forward, ie selected 4wd high then move it diagonaly to the right, you are now in 4wd high centre diff lock, to select 4wd low stop your vehicle and move the lever straight back so it is now opposite where it was to begin, you are now in 4wd low. the lever moves in a inverted U motion.to go back to 2 wheel drive high reverse the process. while driving slowly in 4wd low change to 2nd gear in the main box then using the clutch change the transfer box lever straight forward to 4wd high centre diff lock engaged, then with out using the clutch move the secondary lever to the left 4WD high split drive, now if you wish and you are back on tarmac without using the clutch change back to 2wd high. the first 3 motions can all be carried out up and down without the clutch however 4wd low requires low speed in with clutch and low speed out with clutch.
Bill Moss
Do you have a 460 with selectable 4wd or a 463 with fulltime 4wd. When you push the lever to position 2 does it travel slower relative to engine rpm or stay the same.
Bill
is just a fast idle adjustment which makes it tick over faster on cold mornings, not an issue in your part of the world I wouldn't think, nor mine for that matter.
This sounds like you could be in high range 4WD.
Try pushing the lever to the left and then towards the back.
If you are in 4WD you need to resolve this quickly before you cause some damage.
The "key" could be some non standard modification?
Good Luck
Russ
Bill, the instructor was totally correct in his assessment!............but then thats how you learn. Hopefully without any actual pain to the wallet or physical!!
Johan what is imprinted on the knob on the transfer box shift lever, and is this a RHD truck?
Bill
Johann
I think the knob on dash is an adjuster for engine tickover on the diesel model. Mine does not work but I am sure someone will confirm.
Johann
I think the knob on dash is an adjuster for engine tickover on the diesel model. Mine does not work but I am sure someone will confirm.
It might be what I suspect. you don't have a 460 as stated in your profile, or may be you do with a 463 transmission. easy way to check, what is your chassis number?
460s have selectable 4wd
463s have permanant 4wd
Are your diff locks operated by plungers on the tunnel console or by switches on yourdash?
It would seem that a previous owner has converted the truck to full time 4 wd by fitting a 463 transfer box, which is not a bad thing, some where you may have a switch for engaging the transfer box diff lock.
It is something I have considered doing to one of mine, now I know it can be done I will examing it very carefully.
Bill Moss
Torque Wind up, which means there is no centre diff, or your rear diff lock is engaged
Hmmm (just knocking up my postings), but that was technical hmm. Glad I've got choice of 2 or 4wd. My nearside front UJ has some free play and it knocks a bit when in 4, I'll fix it when this weather clears a bit! Permanent 4 cant do your fuel consumption any good?
One problem though is that when I make very sharp turns especially in reverse it feels like the back wheels kind of stuck when turned at their furthest.
Johann:
What you describe is very highly suspicious. I doubt that somebody has fitted a 463 transfer box to your car for two very good reasons: 1) is that it would not work without replacing both axles as well, since the 463 axles turn in the opposite direction to those of the 460. And 2) is that yours is quite an old G (no offence intended) so why would somebody fit a 463 transfer box in a car whose value is not that greater than the box itself?
It looks to me that either a) your 460-type transfer box is stuck in 4WD or b) your car does not have a 460 transfer box anymore (possibly not even a MB box at all).
To check this, go to your nearest MB garage armed with your car's VIN and politely request that they give you a print-out of your car's datacard. You'll see there the serial number of the transfer box which was fitted to your car in the factory.
The correct type for a 460 is VG080 and the serial number should start 750.60X. If it was a 463 transferbox, it should be type VG150 and model 750.650. Once this is checked go underneath your G and note the serial number stamped on the side of the transferbox and check that it is the same as the one in the data card. MB transfer boxes have serial numbers with 14 digits, for example 750609 10 032566 was the number of the one in my ex-G.
Come back to us with your findings. Good luck
Johann:
No W460 has central diff. That´s why is only part-time 4WD, to avoid transmission wind-up in hard surfaces. On these (on road) you would normally drive in the 2High position (rear-wheel drive only).
The two 4 High positins that you have in the gear lever are exactly the same. They connect the front axle, making the car have four-wheel drive. The fact that there´s no central diff, makes this position totally similar to that of a W463 with the central differential locked, i.e. both axles turn solidly together. This is why this position is only advisable off the road, so that the wheels slide over the ground to compensate for the differences in turning between the axles that the central differential would be otherwise there to compesate.
The 4 low position is virtually identical to the 4 high in every respect other than the fact that there is a reduction in the gearing.
Bill,
The VG 080 transfer case in the 460 series has no center differential. So, both 4WD settings should not be used on hard surfaces.
About brake force distribution, and by the way, I am the author of the article quoted at the beginning of this thread: The brake pressure regulator is designed for various load changes on the rear axle (rear comes up while braking and regulator reduces pressure to prevent lock up). However, when 4WD is engaged its regulating action has no longer any effect.
Here is what happens. The 80% of the brake force applied to the front is results in slowing down of the front wheels. Since there is a solid connection from front wheels, to axle shafts, to front drive shaft, to transfer case, to rear drive shaft, to rear axle shafts, to rear wheels - voila, the rear wheels get more brake force than they should.
One thing that needs to be mentioned here as well is that ABS does no longer work with 4WD engaged.
All this is only valid for the part time 4WD system of the 460. The full time system of the 463 retains brake force bias and the full ABS functionality in high and low range. However, as soon as the center diff lock is activated the 463 behaves like a 460. Too much brake force to the rear, no more ABS.
Cheers!
Harald
New to all this , but I understood that 460 only had two difflocks , 1 in each axle ( cf. 463 which has 3 ie extra centre diff for permenant 4WD ) AND that 460 normally rear drive only , and that when 4WD drive is engaged in high range , or low range which is always 4WD that front axle then driven off transfer gearbox , no diff being involved , unless one chooses to lock up either or both axles.
Marcus
Just to clarify on a couple of Harald's comments,
Bill,
One thing that needs to be mentioned here as well is that ABS does no longer work with 4WD engaged.
All this is only valid for the part time 4WD system of the 460.
I believe that no W460 was even fitted with ABS. Alas, the ABS was specifically developed for the W463 series.
However, as soon as the center diff lock is activated the 463 behaves like a 460. Too much brake force to the rear, no more ABS.
In the W463, as soon as the center diff is locked, the ABS is disconnected. In pre-1994 463 G-Wagens the ABS could also be disconnected manually, by means of a switch on the dashboard.
Cheers
Just to add another, non-technical slant- I travel long distances on Australia's corrugated and loose outback gravel roads which necessitate an average 100-130 kph (60-75mph) just to lessen the vibration and keep the dental work intact.
I always engage 4wd as I get better grip at those speeds.
I have tested my 280GES @ 80-100kph in 2wd on soft, sandy gravel bends and it understeers badly-same speed in 4WD it just turns in normally and grips.
The braking effect is an issue but you drive to the conditions and leave plenty of safety room, bearing in mind that more than one car an hour is a traffic jam out there, three cars and people think it's a parade..
In fact a Ford Explorer nearly killed me by disengaging 4WD in the middle of a wide bend near Mt Isa - not going fast - but I went sideways into the scrub - why those death traps are still being sold is betond me.
Also I have a 460 so no ABS - I regard this as a bonus as it's hopeless on other ( Non Benz) 4wd's I have driven in the dirt.
Cheers.
Jimmy McEwan 8)
I’ve just been for a test of all these theories about losing the back end and different braking in 2 or 4 wheel drive.
Conclusion: They are just theories in practise there is no relevant difference in the cars behaviour on either green grass fields or gravel roads.
I did my tests with my 230 SWB and 300 LWB and tested between 20m/hour and 50 m/hour. I braked hard on straights, around slight curves, and tight turns. Apart from almost rolling my 230 and a few doughnuts, there was no observable difference in braking.
I had a good play around in both 2WD and 4WD and my honest advice is to put it in 4WD as soon as you leave the black. The car is much more stable and I had to work hard to create the feeling of being out of control and when I did managed to get it back quick enough by dropping a gear and giving it boot.
My theory is that the car is so much safer to drive in 4WD and the braking does not have enough of an effect to consider.
It was fun to though!!!
As a newcomer I am now :( very confused with S SA and diff locks etc has anyone got a picture or where can i get one of what is doing what for a 280 1978 G-wagen Thanks Gary
Gary :D, my advise is take it down to a offroad fun day with someone from the club and try all the knobs out .
its a practical skill that need to be learnt on the ground
Twodogs
Thanks will have a go Gary
Look under events - think Dec 17th @ devils pit is the next and believe peter perfect will be there, so should be PERFECT for you :wink: :lol:
Might be there as well if I haven't got too much on :roll:
I know this is an old post, but I'd like to share my experience with 4WD engaging.
I have a 1983 300GD SWB Auto with STT Turbo conversion.
First of all, I've driven the car since I was 16 (now 35) , and I have had no issues with stability or "swapping ends" syndrome all this time.
I've driven it a lot off-road and also did 4 Cyprus-Rally events (part of WRC) as an opening car ("000" car).
I also found that engaging 4wd will not lock the wheels during hard braking on wet roads and it generally feels a lot more stable under wet/muddy conditions.
The only downside is vibration from the drive.
I totally agree with you alexis,i have never had a problem with SA on road with transmission build up or other adverse effects other than a heavier front end.
in fact when i used to come down a particular mountain pass at speed i would always connect to SA when turning sharp bends and the G would "CLING LIKE A CAT!"
Hussein,
if you did not have problems with using SA on-road (yet) it is due to the strength of the G. But if you stress parts long enough - even the toughest will give up.
The fact that you don't notice how the car drives differently (worse) maybe due to your not so sensitive seat of the pants. Driving downhill on pavement with sharp bends (SA engaged) is plain stupid. By doing so you are overriding the rear brake pressure regulator. It might feel like "CLING LIKE A CAT" - but that's your feeling. Just a tad faster than you drove so far, just a tad more brake pressure than you applied so far and your rear will very suddenly move to the outside of the turn - no chance of recovery. I am not just quoting physics books - I have been there.
http://www.4x4abc.com/G-Class/flip.html
Here is why you either drive in 2WD on pavement with a part time 4WD car (460) and why full time 4WD cars (463) do not have that restriction:
http://www.4x4abc.com/4WD101/def_turn.html
But this like the discussion of wheels and gears - there are the laws of physics (and you can explain them until you are blue in the face), and then there are the 4WD users (most of them) who would rather listen to old husband tales.
My experience is very different ...
I agree that you feel more vibration when you engage SA which also depends on the state of your prop shafts, but vibration is always there.
I always use SA when driving fast on gravel roads, something I do a lot, and I've never had the car out of control and I've never had failures. I do the same when the road is very wet.
Hussein knows how bad, abrasive and slippery (fine gravel) our roads can be here in Cyprus.
Without SA, you don't have control of traction on front wheels and therefore cannot get yourself out of emergencies in corners. Which also means you can not recover when you lose the rear of the car as there is no drive to the front wheels to pull you out of a slide.
For a 2 ton car, it can be driven very fast with SA and you can even enter into corners sideways to give you a cleaner and straighter exit to a corner.
On the other hand, if you drive with the differential locks, then you are looking for trouble and you will definitely break things.
your opinions alexis are the same as mine.i have hardly ever used SA here in the uk and never really needed it.but as you mentioned the terrain in cyprus is different.even the asphalt we drive on in the north is like glass,ok its quiet but boy does it slide in the wet :shock:
i think knowing your G's limits minimizes an accident and reading the the road ahead is very important.
i must say i have driven a G in cyprus for 12 years and always used the same philosophy and never had a problem,but i am alot more aware now of this so called stress that can be put on the transmission when using SA on non-slippery surfaces.
rgds hus.
Lets make this a bit clearer, guys:
You should never use SA or GA on hight traction surfaces (mostly dry paved roads)
It is not only perfectly allright, but highly recommended to use SA on all low traction surfaces (ice, snow, sand, gravel, mud, water etc) - it in fact makes driving more stable because the available traction is used more intelligently than in 2WD. That is especially important in turns:
http://www.4x4abc.com/4WD101/tractionturn2.html
http://www.4x4abc.com/4WD101/tractionturn4.html
http://www.4x4abc.com/4WD101/tractionuse2.html
http://www.4x4abc.com/4WD101/tractionuse4.html
If you want to dig deeper into that subject google "Kamm's circle" or "Kammscher Kreis"
GA is a different story. Since it produces 2.14 time the amount of torque it is not good for slippery surfaces - it is mostly for off-road needs (when high torque and slow speeds are needed)
Starting to understand a bit more of the "when" bit to engage 4x4. But maybe a degree in physics will help :)
On the "how" part I'm still lost. My w460 300GD's second transmision seem to only have two positions. One forward and one backwards. On the dash underneath the hazard switch there is a key like switch that can be turned. Does this have anything to do with 4wd ?